naming conventions - Google's CSS styling -
having been inspecting few elements on google, noticed naming conventions funky, ie.
.n-wa-q-dc, .n-xb .n-wa-q-dc:hover
this not readable/manageable human. opinion google's css , class names largely auto generated server side technology.
i cant see people maintaining such css file myself.
would advisable such large system (google) have any people managing css , let systems handle it?
they should have version human-readable (for development) and, that, generate obfuscated version (for deployment). likely, search-n-replace performed on names of scripts or stylesheets (from using human-readable obfuscated ones) before deployment.
Comments
Post a Comment