naming conventions - Google's CSS styling -


having been inspecting few elements on google, noticed naming conventions funky, ie.

.n-wa-q-dc, .n-xb .n-wa-q-dc:hover 

this not readable/manageable human. opinion google's css , class names largely auto generated server side technology.

i cant see people maintaining such css file myself.

would advisable such large system (google) have any people managing css , let systems handle it?

they should have version human-readable (for development) and, that, generate obfuscated version (for deployment). likely, search-n-replace performed on names of scripts or stylesheets (from using human-readable obfuscated ones) before deployment.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Using a Cron Job to check if my mod_wsgi / apache server is running and restart -

actionscript 3 - TweenLite does not work with object -

jQuery Ajax Render Fragments OR Whole Page -